Speed dating southern maine
Speed dating southern maine - personal dating site in usa
The beach, in turn has subsided to where the stone now exists.
It seems to compare well with Scandinavian architecture and also to have been built to an ancient Norwegian measurement system, according to Frederick J. It has been, and remains, the single most notable attraction to A much later visiting Norwegian scholar felt that certain markings he observed some 12 feet high on the West side seemed to be runes and translates as: "Church of the Bishop’s seat", the bishop being thought one now know was the case.It is not known if he ever arrived or ever returned from this voyage as this is the end of his saga.Perhaps this tower represents his presence and ultimate failure of re-conversions of the new genetic specific people called Another argument of my own and some others is that it is unlikely to have been a windmill because of technical weaknesses of building a windmill from masonry or stone.While the runes are translated with the date 1001(AD, presumably), it need not have been carved in precisely that year, but at any year within the next thirty or so when it appeared that Vikings intended permanent settlement of this coastline.The marker, therefore, seems to be a notice of interest to ships "coasting" off shore.Secondly, the inscriptions of the upper two lines of three are deeply incised into hard stone while the lowest nearest the bottom and apparently originally as deep and clear has eroded to where it is illegible.
This comparison of clear letters with erosion of the lower line indicate – proves in my estimation, great antiquity, certainly of many centuries. It is thought by some that the name of the island had been "Norman's Land" (Vikings Land) because of the presence of the rock.This is nature's way of demonstrating the old trick of yanking a tablecloth away while leaving the plate and silverware in place.before 1492 were created with hard stone and lack the clear definition that iron tools yield.) Most significant factors in favor of these carvings validity are, first: the stone’s placement which makes no sense whatsoever for a land marker - it is adjacent to, and faces the sea.I am aware that this has been done and there are examples of it, especially with masonry which, by its geometric regularity of bricks is more stable.But built with stone is problematical because of the dynamic vibrations set up by the turning arms of the windmill.I have been inside a windmill with the sails turning at moderate speed and I can affirm that this is somewhat more than the word vibration implies.